Skip to main content
Union County Banner
 

File #: 24-810    Version: 1
Type: Public Hearing Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/18/2024 In control: Board of Commissioners
On agenda: 12/2/2024 Final action:
Title: Public Hearing - Text Amendment to Table 5-2 (R District Lot and Building Regulations - Conventional Development) and 60.070 (Lots and Access) of the Union County Development Ordinance
Attachments: 1. Ordinance, 2. Exhibit A, 3. Consistency and Reasonableness Statements, 4. Presentation
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

TITLE:title

Public Hearing - Text Amendment to Table 5-2 (R District Lot and Building Regulations - Conventional Development) and 60.070 (Lots and Access) of the Union County Development Ordinance

body

INFORMATION CONTACT:  

Lee Jenson, Planning, Director, 704-283-3564

ACTION REQUESTED:

Conduct a public hearing.

 

If the Board wishes to take action, consider the following:

 

TO APPROVE THE TEXT AMENDMENTS (THE TEXT AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT PLAN)

 

Motion

 

(i)                     Adopt the Ordinance Approving Text Amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance of Union County, North Carolina; and (ii) adopt the consistency and reasonableness statement for approval.

 

 

TO DENY THE TEXT AMENDMENTS (THE TEXT AMENDMENTS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT PLAN)

 

Motion

 

(i) Deny the text amendments set forth in TXT-2024-003; and (ii) adopt the consistency and reasonableness statement for denial.

 

PRIOR BOARD ACTIONS:

None.

BACKGROUND:

These proposed text amendments are intended to increase safety and decrease driveway access points along major corridors in Union County. The amendments would increase lot road frontage requirements along roadways in Union County that have a posted speed limit of 45 MPH or greater. In addition, along those same roadways, lot size requirements would be increased as well, thereby, decreasing overall density for lots taking direct access along higher speed corridors.

 

The Land Use Board considered this text amendment at their regular meeting in November and unanimously recommended to deny the amendment. The major concern the Land Use Board had was that the amendment could impact the affordability and availability of land and prevent families from conveying lots to children or grandchildren.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: 

None.