Legislation Details

File #: 24-418    Version: 1
Type: Consent Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/3/2024 In control: Board of Commissioners
On agenda: 6/17/2024 Final action:
Title: Medical Examiners Office - Recommend Construction Manager at Risk Construction Delivery Method
Attachments: 1. Delivery Method Analysis
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TITLE:title
Medical Examiners Office - Recommend Construction Manager at Risk Construction Delivery Method
body
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Boyd, Facilities & Fleet Management, Director, 704-283-3868
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the use of the Construction Manager at Risk delivery method for the Medical Examiners Office project.
PRIOR BOARD ACTIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The capital improvement project to build a regional medical examiners office will be managed by the Union County Facilities and Fleet Management Department.
Per NCGS 143-128.1.e, Construction Management at Risk (CM@Risk) services may be used by the public entity only after the public entity has concluded that CM@Risk services is in the best interest of the project, and the public entity has compared the advantages and disadvantages of using the CM@Risk method for a given project in lieu of traditional delivery methods.
Facilities Management has evaluated the traditional Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, and CM@Risk delivery methods. Based on current construction market conditions including ongoing inflation of construction input costs and continuing long lead times, the CM@Risk delivery method is proposed. This method offers many advantages including: quicker costing, scheduling analysis, flexible scoping, qualification-based contractor selection, pre-qualification of subcontractors, state-mandated bidding guidelines, and cost transparency. Using the traditional Design-Bid-Build delivery is not favorable as it presents significant risks including potential for limited bidders, bid day budget busts, delays and cost increases due less flexible scheduling options. The Design-Build method is not viable given the uncertainty of design requirements for the project. Additional benefits of the CM@Risk method and a detailed comparison of the other two delivery methods are outlined in the attachment for this item.
Facilities Management recommends CM@Risk based on past successful projects like the Sheriff'...

Click here for full text